lhsbanner buildregisters oran

lhsbanner csbtk blue

lhsbanner fmb2

News

Mortgage news: Mansfield

Mansfield Building Society helps to Accelerate self build lending

Read more

Quantity over quality?

YouGov Survey reveals over 50% of developer-led builds have a variety of problems 

Read more

Bath Street project nears completion

Work on the pioneering Bath Street Collective Custom Build reaches final stage

Read more

Case Studies

Contemporary Timber Frame Home

Read more

Passivhaus Family Farmhouse

Read more

Steel Farm

Read more

Merlin Haven

Read more

Timber Frame Home, Ventnor

Read more

Aldcliffe Yard, Lancaster

Read more

Walthamstow Social Rent Scheme

Read more

Prefabricated Passivhaus bungalow

Read more

Cookham Dean, Berkshire

Read more

Harvest House

Read more

Bickleigh Eco Village, Devon

Read more

Stoke-on-Trent Serviced Building Plots

Read more

Forevergreen House

Read more

Housing People Building Communities

Read more

Sülzer Freunde, Cologne

Read more

Berlin - 'Building Groups'

Read more

Manor Farm, Kirton

Read more

Straw-baling, Perthshire

Read more

Findhorn

Read more

Almere, Holland

Read more

Hockerton

Read more

Top tips

Stamp duty

Stamp duty Read more

we support_logo-2tb

Quantity over quality?

YouGov Survey reveals over 50% of developer-led builds have a variety of problems 

 

 

24th April 2017

A YouGov Survey by housing and homelessness charity, Shelter, has revealed that 51% of people have experienced issues with new developer-built homes. The report, titled New Civic Housebuilding, sampled 4,341 UK buyers and shows that over half of those that purchased a home from a large developer discovered significant problems with the construction, internal fittings and utilities within the builds.

Shelter carried out the investigation in order to highlight the negative impact large, developer-led initiatives can have on the housing market. They suggest that we are not building enough houses, and the ones we are building are being done so in the wrong way.

The report shows that eight in 10 working families are unable to afford a newly-built home; which could be as a result of developers competing for land and driving up the final unit value. According to the report, new homes are 25% more expensive than older builds, despite the fact that less than 30% of those surveyed actually wanted to live in a new build. Significantly, only 22% felt that new homes were of a better quality than older builds.

The investigation was carried out in the wake of residential developer, Bovis Homes, setting aside £7m in damages for their disgruntled clients. In December 2016, Bovis financially rewarded buyers if they moved into incomplete properties in order to hit annual sales targets. This left many new home owners with fundamental issues with their purchases.

New Civic Housebuilding proposes a radical restructure in the UK housing market through rediscovering our traditional homebuilding techniques in order to deliver higher-quality affordable homes. The report suggests that large property developers are favoured over individuals and families, and that the level of competition over land significantly works against the public interest.

The report provides a ‘civic’ model for best practice that Shelter hopes the Government will take on board. The prototype focuses on quality, affordability and localism, highlighting how land should be sold at a fair value, considerate of local need. Shelter refers to the Bourneville village model as an example of how this approach has worked successfully in the past.

 

Comments  

 
#1 John Cattermole 2017-04-25 22:45
We faced a shocking double standard in favour of volume house builders and predeterminatio n by the LPA on day 2 of our application for the highest standard of affordable Eco house despite NO measurable harm to anyone: APP/J0405/W/16/3164359
We have lived in our village for 20 years where we hoped to build a home slightly bigger than the home we have outgrown. The sites is 10 metres from a new 48 house greenfield development. A development for 4 houses on the same site was approved the day after our appeal dismissal. A further 298 houses have been approved on greenfield sites within a 2 mile radius. We complained after our LPA officer said he would refuse the application as he was affixing the public notice to the site gate. The Inspector said the Ombudsman could investigate. The ombudsman said the Inspector had jurisdiction. The complaint was not investigated. AVDC and the Inspectorate are not interested in anything but high numbers and CIL. LPAs are not assessed by house quality.
 

Have your say

You need to sign in to be able to post comments

Sign in Register